Douglas Murray Triumphs in Libel Suit Against Muslim "Influencer"
In a sweeping courtroom triumph, Douglas Murray defends free speech and the fight against extremism, as a UK judge tosses a defamation suit by Muslim influencer Mohammed Hijab, affirming the journalist’s right to expose hate and echoing a broader stand against antisemitism.
In a resounding victory for free speech and honest journalism, British author and staunch Israel supporter Douglas Murray has successfully defended himself against a defamation lawsuit filed by Muslim influencer Mohammed Hijab. A UK court dismissed the case on August 5, labeling Hijab's evidence as "worthless" and accusing him of dishonesty during the proceedings.
The dispute arose from a 2023 article Murray penned for *The Spectator*, in which he branded Hijab a "pro-terrorist preacher" and spotlighted his alleged antisemitic rhetoric, including derogatory comments about Hindus. Hijab, who boasts millions of online followers and has been criticized for inflammatory statements at pro-Palestine rallies, claimed the piece tarnished his reputation. However, the judge ruled in Murray's favor, affirming that his remarks constituted fair opinion and were grounded in fact.
This ruling marks Murray's second libel win this year. In March, he prevailed against *The Observer* (a Guardian Media Group publication) for baseless accusations, securing damages and a public apology. Murray, celebrated in Jewish circles for books like *The Madness of Crowds* and his unflinching defense of Israel amid rising global antisemitism, hailed the decision as a safeguard for critical reporting. "This protects those who call out extremism without fear of reprisal," Murray stated, echoing sentiments shared by *The Spectator*.
For the Jewish community, the case resonates deeply. Murray has long been an ally, decrying antisemitism in Europe and the Middle East, and supporting Israel's right to self-defense. Hijab's past remarks, including calls that some interpret as endorsing violence against Jews, have drawn ire from Jewish advocacy groups like the Anti-Defamation League. The
Legal analysts suggest the outcome could embolden journalists covering sensitive topics like radical Islam and Jewish security. As costs mount for Hijab, who has yet to comment, this victory shines brightly.