Tucker Carlson Loses The Plot | WATCH
By praising Mamdani and amplifying Stephanopoulos’s anti-Israel rhetoric, Tucker courts both pro- and anti-Israel audiences. His silence on dubious claims and alliances with figures like Greene reveal a grifter’s playbook, leveraging hot-button issues to stay relevant, truth be damned.

Tucker Carlson, once a Fox News titan, has reinvented himself as a "free-speech crusader" on platforms like *The Tucker Carlson Show*, claiming to challenge establishment narratives. But a recent interview with Mother Agapia Stephanopoulos, a Russian Orthodox nun in Judea and Samaria, has fueled accusations that he’s a grifter exploiting divisive issues for clout. When Stephanopoulos pitched a “dream trip” to Jenin and Bethlehem with Mel Gibson, Cat Stevens, Zohran Mamdani, Brad Lander, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, Carlson quipped, “I want to go to that dinner.” The lighthearted exchange belies a deeper pattern: Carlson panders to anti-Israel sentiment while cozying up to pro-Israel conservatives, revealing a calculated opportunism that undermines his credibility.
The Interview: Stirring the Pot
On August 11, 2025, Carlson hosted Stephanopoulos on his show, titled “Here’s What It’s Really Like to Live as a Christian in the Holy Land.” The episode, racking up over 12 million views on YouTube and X, focused on Palestinian Christians’ struggles under Israeli occupation, alleging restrictions like permit requirements and land seizures. Stephanopoulos called Israel’s policies “apartheid-like” and questioned American Christian support for Israel. Her “dream trip” to Jenin and Bethlehem with figures like Gibson (known for antisemitic outbursts), Stevens (a Muslim convert with a controversial past), and Mamdani (a pro-Palestine socialist) was a provocative nod to highlighting Palestinian issues.
Carlson’s enthusiastic reply played into the moment’s theatrics but sparked backlash for amplifying anti-Israel voices. X users like @OliveTreeMin and @TrevorLoudon1 slammed the interview as a “charade,” accusing Stephanopoulos of peddling “anti-Israel lies” and Carlson of going along to boost his brand among viewers skeptical of Israel.
The Grift: Straddling Both Sides
Carlson’s track record shows a knack for playing both sides. Earlier in 2025, he and Marjorie Taylor Greene praised Zohran Mamdani, a pro-Palestine socialist running for New York City mayor, for focusing on local issues during a debate. Carlson lauded Mamdani’s refusal to name Israel as a dream travel destination, saying, “He’s the only person in the New York City mayor’s debate to say he wanted to focus on New York City.” Greene called it “the right answer,” framing Mamdani’s win over Andrew Cuomo as a Republican failure. This puzzled conservatives, with @ebscbwi accusing Carlson of endorsing someone who’s vowed to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he visits New York.
Yet Carlson hasn’t ditched his pro-Israel base. His alliance with Greene, a vocal Israel supporter, and past criticism of Iran show he’s not fully embracing an anti-Israel stance. Instead, he’s crafting a persona that appeals to both MAGA loyalists and conservatives questioning U.S. support for Israel. By hosting guests like Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian and John Mearsheimer alongside pro-Israel figures like Greene, Carlson keeps his audience hooked through controversy. His praise for Mamdani’s localism and nod to Stephanopoulos’s anti-Israel rhetoric suggest a grift aimed at driving clicks, not a principled shift.
It's important to mention that Greene is moving away from her pro-Israel stance too, so if he wants to convince us he hasn't gone full Nazi, he's going to have to find another pro-Jewish voice to platform.
The Backlash: Charges of Antisemitism and Hypocrisy
The Stephanopoulos interview drew sharp criticism from pro-Israel voices. Israel365 News debunked nine alleged falsehoods, including her claim that Bethlehem Christians need permits to visit Jerusalem, noting Israelis are barred from Palestinian-controlled areas like Bethlehem for security reasons. Pastor Greg Locke called Carlson a “fool” for promoting “lies to justify Jew hate,” while @ebscbwi accused Stephanopoulos of siding with “terrorists” who target Christians, pointing to her silence on Palestinian Authority abuses like the 2002 Church of the Nativity siege. Critics also flagged her unverified claims, like alleging IDF atrocities in 2002, which she later admitted she didn’t witness.
The Cost of Carlson’s Game
Carlson’s two-faced approach does more than dent his credibility. Critics say Stephanophoulos misrepresents Palestinian Christian life. Although the Christian population in Samaria has dropped from 10% in the early 20th century to under 2% today, she lays the blame at Israel's door and sidesteps pressures from the Palestinian Authority and Hamas, which have also driven Christian emigration through discrimination.
As @TrevorLoudon1 put it on X, Carlson’s platforming of Stephanopoulos’s “lunatic” conspiracies proves he’s more about spectacle than substance.
Carlson’s “dream trip” quip is a small but telling glimpse into his strategy: stir controversy, flirt with opposing sides, and keep the clicks rolling. As the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains a flashpoint, Carlson’s opportunism risks deepening divides, proving that for him, controversy is king.