Skip to main content

Strike Iran More or Ceasefire Now?

Israeli Cabinet Debates Next Steps on Iran as Strikes Weaken Regime Capabilities

In a heated Israeli cabinet meeting, ministers debated continuing strikes on Iran after significant military successes, with some pushing for regime change while Prime Minister Netanyahu focused on achieved goals of neutralizing Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities. The discussion highlighted strategic gains, including the strike on Evin Prison, and considerations for a ceasefire amid U.S. involvement and Iran’s weakened state.

2 min read
Netanyahu at a meeting of the Security Cabinet
Photo: Yonatan Zindel / Flash90

In a tense cabinet meeting, Israeli leaders clashed over the next steps following devastating strikes on Iran’s nuclear and missile infrastructure. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasized the operation’s success, stating, “This wasn’t about regime change but achieving two goals: neutralizing their nuclear program and missiles.” The strikes, which included a significant hit on Tehran’s Evin Prison, left Iran at a “difficult decision point,” according to the Chief of Staff, who added, “We’ve achieved tremendous results in their nuclear program and missile systems. The U.S. joining the campaign is a historic turning point.”

The acting Shin Bet chief urged closure, saying, “We need to aim for an endgame. We’ve delivered exceptional results.” The IDF’s research head noted, “The day after Evin was significant. The Iranians were deliberating their response. The assassination of their scientists sparked serious internal debate.” The Chief of Staff reported, “Their missile defense system is suppressed, and their offensive capabilities are limited.” The Mossad chief cautioned, “Our achievements are high, and the home front’s cost is lower than expected, but we must ensure we don’t face another war in five to seven years.”

Some ministers pushed for bolder aims. Justice Minister Yariv Levin suggested, “We need to consider destabilizing their regime.” Ministers Gila Gamliel and Miri Regev agreed, while Itamar Ben-Gvir pressed, “We should add regime collapse to our war goals and continue strikes for a few more days.” Conversely, Zeev Elkin advocated for a ceasefire, noting, “We’ve achieved most of our objectives.” Orit Strook proposed a Lebanon-style model, stating, “The army met its goals. Any violation or rearmament attempt should be met with fire.” Avi Dichter highlighted timing, saying, “Their Ashura is on Saturday. They’re in mourning, which might push them to close this. We should end it with these major gains.”

Netanyahu predicted, “Trump will call for a ceasefire. We’re continuing intense strikes now. This was a cancerous mass we removed, but cancer can return if not managed.” He urged restraint, adding, “These are sensitive hours; I ask you not to speak publicly.” The debate reflects Israel’s strategic calculus amid Iran’s weakened state and U.S. support, with Ashura’s timing and Iran’s internal turmoil shaping ceasefire considerations.


Loading comments...