Muslim Mayors Conquer England
While Western societies grew fractured and apathetic, Islamic organizers filled the vacuum, one mosque, one ballot box, one city at a time.
Twitter
The reason Muslim politicians are increasingly successful in becoming mayors across Western cities is not necessarily due to superior policies or broad democratic appeal. Rather, it lies in the deep fragmentation of the communal space in Western societies, which creates a power vacuum easily filled from the bottom up. This is the very space in which the Muslim Brotherhood excels, organizing grassroots communities and gradually absorbing entire geographic areas under the influence of sharia-aimed governance models.
Yes, these mayors often operate within a limited framework: their roles are mostly ceremonial or administrative. They manage trash collection, oversee local infrastructure, and are heavily reliant on the national welfare state for resource allocation. Strip away national funding, and many of these municipal frameworks would collapse.
But that’s all Islam needs to function politically, a platform based on the familiar triad of the mosque, the community center, and social services, long mastered by the Muslim Brotherhood. It may be a primitive model by Western standards, but it is efficient, disciplined, and highly effective at spreading influence.
Let’s not forget: Barack Obama himself began as a community organizer, a model that has since been adopted and perfected by the newer wave of Islamic organizers in the West. It’s not through entrepreneurship or innovation that these groups expand; they import wealth from oil states and build urban footholds from Rotterdam to New York.
While the far-left and far-right accuse "Zionists" of controlling governments from the top down, on the ground, in cities like Dallas, Texas, there are already over 60 functioning mosques. In New York City, the number of mosques has surpassed the number of synagogues (569 vs. 492).
Most normal people or organizations have little interest in running cities as a project, urban governance in the modern European model offers limited legal or economic power.
But it does shape public space, influences daily life, and creates precedents. A mayor can change the cultural and civic climate just by redefining what’s “normal”. This allows a unified Muslim voting bloc to gradually push reforms, city by city. That’s why in Britain today, cities like Sheffield, Liverpool, London, Oxford, Bradford, Luton, Birmingham, and Camden have Muslim mayors. In Leeds, it’s the deputy mayor. The strategy is straightforward: promise enough white politicians from the left that you’ll deliver the “Muslim vote bloc” - and you’ve bought the nomination. And from there, the reshaping of civic life begins.
What can you do? They rarely build businesses of their own; instead, they import capital from the desert. And so, from Rotterdam to New York, they are busy establishing urban footholds, which are gulf-state investments.
In today’s European model, municipal leadership holds little real legal or economic power. But it does offer something else: the ability to regulate the temperature of the water in which the citizen frogs, i mean citizens, boils. I.e to shape the public space in subtle but profound ways.
That’s all the Muslim community needs: an open civic platform, where it can unite like a clenched fist and launch a chain reaction of reforms, city by city.