Trump and Massie Go Head To Head Over Iran Strikes
President Trump's bold bombing of Iran's nuclear sites may have stunned Tehran, but it’s ignited a political firestorm at home, with his own party turning on him over war powers.
Twitter
On June 21, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that U.S. B-2 stealth bombers had struck three Iranian nuclear facilities in a mission dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer." The strikes, aimed at crippling Iran’s nuclear ambitions, have ignited a fierce constitutional debate, with one of Trump’s own party members, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), leading the charge against him.
Massie, a libertarian-leaning Republican known for his strict constitutionalism, swiftly condemned the strikes as “not constitutional” on X, arguing that the U.S. Constitution’s Article I reserves the power to declare war for Congress. “No imminent threat to America justified bypassing Congress,” Massie wrote, referencing his recent bipartisan War Powers Resolution, co-sponsored with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), to block U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict without legislative approval.
Trump fired back on Truth Social, branding Massie a “LOSER” and “not MAGA,” while vowing to back a primary challenger in Kentucky’s 2026 Republican primary. The public feud has exposed deep rifts within the GOP, pitting Trump’s interventionist move against the party’s non-interventionist wing.
The strikes have also revived a long-simmering debate over presidential war powers. Democratic lawmakers, including Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), echoed Massie’s call for congressional authorization, with some even raising the specter of impeachment. Meanwhile, Trump allies like Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the president’s authority to act against nuclear proliferation.
As Iran threatens retaliation and regional tensions mount, Massie plans to introduce a new War Powers Resolution on June 24 to halt U.S. military action in Iran absent congressional approval. The clash invites a broader question: Can Congress reclaim its constitutional role in matters of war, or will the executive branch’s dominance persist?
The fallout has fractured Trump’s MAGA base, with some supporters cheering the strikes as “decisive” and others decrying them as a betrayal of his “America First” pledge to avoid foreign entanglements. For now, Massie stands firm, a lone constitutionalist in a party increasingly shaped by Trump’s vision.