The Left Keeps Murdering Palestianins In The Name of "Peace"

The Israeli left was not always pathologically obsessed with the Muslims who call themselves Palestinians. It once (Until the 1980s) had genuine values of its own: settlement, collectivism, pioneering spirit, and Zionism.

The events of October 7 jolted many out of their Palestinian delusions - but the underlying moral corruption and ideological damage remain largely intact.

The problem is that from a genuinely humanistic and universal perspective, the ideological rot embedded in their peace-obsessed worldview doesn't primarily endanger Jews, it endangers the very Arab children they claim to champion. Their delusions are killing the very Palestinians they pretend to save.

Compassion becomes dangerous when translated into political decisions without empirical consideration. Unlike interpersonal empathy, the act of service itself is not enough - for it alone cannot prevent collective catastrophes which ensue once the object of compassion is not compatible with the proposed remedies on a larger scale.

In Israel, there are many examples from recent history that vividly illustrate this exact point.

Supporters of the Oslo Accords (1993), the Gaza disengagement (2005), and advocates of Palestinian autonomy/statehood (1967-till now), believed these steps would promote peace and improve Palestinian lives. Yet, the more the left gave land and independent status - the more those steps led to military escalation which led to the death of Arab children. Since 1993, The more the Arabs got land - the more they started a war with the Jews, and the more their children died – 32 years later – methodology works with clockwork precision in so many instances under simillar conditions!

This observation is valid, empiric, causal, and reliable as a 2005 Toyota Camry.

Oslo and the disengagement led to a sharp rise in terrorism, including rocket attacks on Israel. Consequently, not only were Israeli citizens harmed, but the Palestinian population suffered a massive rise in deaths.

Ironically, right-wing Jews advocating for control or expulsion of Gazans may be the only ones capable of saving Palestinian lives, unlike those pushing for a Palestinian state or land giveaways.

Why? Granting land to a Arab-Muslim society hands them a license for war - leading in turn and creating the political opportunity for more armed conflict and more child sacrifice.

At this point in the history of the conflict, this causal sequence has proven itself so many times, it makes you wonder whether these leftists are not secret extremists who offer these peace solutions only so they can indulge in the death of Arab children.

The Israeli left’s orientalist mindset (like that of it's European and American friends) has become a mass death trap for the region as a whole.

Now, under a government that masquerades as right-wing yet refuses to save Arab lives by expelling the Arabs so that they cannot sacrifice their own kids for holy-war, the ongoing friction-policy guarantees a grinding cycle of death.

In that sense, Netanyahu’s government is effectively aligned with the left’s utopian death cult calmly portrayed as the so-called political-option, or if you wish the “two-state solution.”

Remember – every time you say “two state solution” you yourself kill a Palestinian child with your very mouth.

From a broader perspective, it seems that the Israeli political left is continuing the global economic left’s legacy: experimenting with utopias at the expense of real human lives.

Those who truly wish to save Arab children and women must embrace right-wing policies. Handing over territories without effective oversight or granting Muslim autonomies creates bases for murderous acts against Israelis, triggering Israeli military responses that kill Arab children.

Even now, Israel bears responsibility for not opening its borders to allow Palestinians to escape the cycle of violence they’ve chosen.

Like the left, the Israeli government exacerbates Palestinian suffering more than any right-wing extremist calling for Gaza’s conquest or expulsion.

The thematic lesson is that political compassion, when applied without analysis of the context and intentions in which the object of compassion exists, and without an understanding of the meaning and ramifications of "making a deal" with that side - can lead to conflict. The moral lesson one can learn from the Israeli left's scarifying of Palestinian children to the "political solution" Molech, is that when a problem becomes a re-occurring issue, without having the human decency or empathy to admit a mistake, analyze, question, and change course - you will hurt the very object you wish to assist.

While interpersonal compassion is a pure human act, political compassion demands responsibility and foresight to avoid amplifying suffering.

In the Israeli-Arab context, we must learn from the past and apply more precise judgment moving forward.

For leftists, it should begin with reading the Quran and the writings of Hegel and understanding how the two converged within Palestinian nationalism into a Germanic-Arabic, framework of medieval Islamic-jihad fused with collective-Idealism, both stemming from a Master-Slave annihilationist idea of the Zionist project which must come to an end in a catharsis rebellion, which will materialize and bring catharsis to Palestinianism as phenomena, only once the extinction of the Israeli-Jew will become reality.

Afterwards, they should go back and realize that everything they’ve done over the past 40 years was entirely predictable to anyone with a shred of critical thinking.