The Reason Tyler Robinson Murdered Charlie Kirk

The attempt to impose an unnatural order on the world represents not only transgenderism but progressivism in general. Therefore, it is with no surprise that progressives find themselves comfortable to encourage this form of identity and to develop its standing into a political ideology of struggle against the laws of nature.

This unnatural arrangements do not necessarily need to be labeled as mental illnesses, although they likely involve some degree of delusion or hormonal imbalance.

We have reached a point where the harnessing of the abnormal into the world order, and the attempt to normalize it, is not intended to enable the sexual deviations of those promoting these behaviors - but primarily as a tool of ideological violence aimed at a political enemy.

Thus, it is not only that to join the broad tent of leftism, the audition will require some abnormal patterns, so that these can be used against the classical liberal or conservative order based on the classical English tradition focused on natural laws as the basis of societal and political discourse, these abnormalities must be extreme, so that they can produce, in the process of imposing themselves on the natural order, a feeling of suppression, and anger, that can translate into violence.

The Left's need for violence as a means of ideological-validation was explained by me in a previous essay. My core argument was that only through violence, i.e., coercion, can unrealistic or unnatural concepts and tendencies on broad scales of social existence, be normalized. Hence, exhibiting coercion is essential to validate an irrational concept of justice.

If so, it seems that the problem with the left is that the absence of any natural law which can affirm a sensible standard, I.e. - bring forth a reality check, creates fraudulent/alternative standards, that their lack of operational functionality, masquerading as justice, creates resentment which breeds violence.

This worsens as the so-called socialist-economic-core becomes allied with the abnormal which refuses not only economic reality, but also the biological one, and sees in biological reality, as trans-ideology does, an outright enemy.

A complete refusal to discuss the normal as a necessary function of statistical or biological reality, can also be seen in the push of radical feminism, and of vast dysfunctional multi-cultural arrangements in Europe, backed by the denial of IQ differences. All seem as though they are engineered to create a deliberate lack of societal harmony which can be weaponized.

Thus after analyzing (in short) the historical-anthropological breeding ground of the trans-progressive alliance, and its root in the hatred of Natural Law, we can now began to penetrate the mind of the murderer of Charlie Kirk.

This person, coming from a conservative and Christian background, struggled even more to bear the fact that he was a homosexual, despite homosexuality having already been incorporated into the spectrum of clinical normality in recent decades, and even into the conservative movement.

His difficulty in accepting his own obvious homosexuality, manifested in being sexually aroused by men trying to ''become women''.

This obvious repression sought ideological justification, and the need to justify ideologically, what is repressed biologically, sparked resentment which led to violence. Given a lack of self-reflection, and healthy coping mechanisms it is needless to say that trans-Ideology, which anywat denies all of the above, and focuses soley on rage and death, was an easy go-to option, given his already sick sexual fantasies.

There's no doubt this sick man in an unhealthy environment used a violent ideology to escape his need to reflect on the core of his deviant nature. Hence, he chose to surrender to his dark side, and no doubt he deserves a cruel and unusual tortuous death.

This denial of homosexuality is what led to the killing of Kirk, who knew, like anyone else, that Tyler Robinson is in fact homosexual. Something Tyler himself, given his dysfunctional nature, and conservative background, could never accept.

Transgenderism, in its denial of reality, is even more disturbed than the homosexuality it seeked to hide.

Homosexuality at least involves an acknowledgment of the natural biological state of organisms, whereas transgenderism involves a repression of the natural state so extreme that it seeks a political sublimation of its extreme perverse nature.

Only in and within it, can this radical imposing of the unnatural on the natural make some sense. Thus, being violent in nature in its imposing, Transgenderism, in its hate of biology can easily be used and turned into a hate of society.

Homosexuality, while perhaps a deviation from normalcy, does not attempt to overturn nature itself. Transgenderism has perhaps sadly turned not only into a violent denial of one's own homosexuality, but to a denial that finds its justification in leftist ideology.

This is why someone with sexual deviations like Robinson, who loves animals and other such things, found this ideology appealing as he struggled to shake off his inner homosexual torment.